The Amsterdam club and the head of youth went this week apart. Initially there was an arbitration case follow the departure, but both sides were still a akkooord.
“It was important to achieve a good division of labor. There I quickly insisted,” Jonk looks opposite The Telegraph back to his start at Ajax in 2011 and the implementation plan Cruyff.
“Let’s take a good look at the responsibilities and powers who hear it, because otherwise you’ll in each other’s way and it does not work. That is proved. The job descriptions were never worked out well. “
Dissatisfaction with the implementation of the plan Jonk slipped lately not at meetings of the technical heart Ajax, which include Frank de Boer, Dennis Bergkamp and Marc Overmars sit in
. <- block: | article link end ->
Side issues
The criticism that followed was unjustified as Jonk. “That people I blame my absence, I find very shortsighted,” he says.
“I have long been kept full and have put forward more and solutions. But if there is no operation defined and you continue to get into discussions on side issues, keep it once. “
” Especially when others about your players and staff members can decide without having the right information or involvement. Then you can not decide, I think. “
According to Jonk was in many ways departed from the plan Cruyff. “Then you’re talking into the game, purchasing, international collaborations and how the technical heart works. There are not made the right choices.”
Pride
Nevertheless, Jonk also means feeling good about his work with Ajax. “I have in any event left a program with more structure and more attention to the individual. The number of youth players that has already been broken at first, it fills me with pride.”
“There are a lot of good , beautiful players through, with properties to be developed further. But the point is that you deliver players with an above-average level. And that is successful. “
After the departure of Jonk left Ajax know to go looking for a suitable successor
No comments:
Post a Comment